4.2 Article

Storm-Water Bioretention for Runoff Quality and Quantity Mitigation

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING-ASCE
Volume 137, Issue 9, Pages 800-808

Publisher

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000388

Keywords

Best management practice; Storm water runoff management; Hydrology; Water quality; Karst; Bioretention

Funding

  1. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In response to water quality and quantity issues within the Stroubles Creek watershed in Blacksburg, Virginia, a retrofit bioretention cell (BRC) was installed to collect and treat runoff from an existing parking lot. The BRC was completed in July 2007, and 28 precipitation events were monitored between October 2007 and June 2008. For each storm, inflow and outflow flow-weighted composite samples were collected and analyzed for suspended sediment, total nitrogen, and total phosphorus. The inflow and outflow concentrations and loads, as well as total inflow and outflow volumes and peak flow rates, were analyzed to evaluate BRC efficiency. Overall, the BRC successfully reduced flow volumes and peak flow rates leaving the parking lot by 97 and 99%, respectively. Cumulative mass reductions for sediment, total nitrogen, and total phosphorus all exceeded 99% by mass. The findings of this study have significant implications for areas with karst geology: (1) current design recommendations of lining the bottom of BRCs with clay may not be sufficient to prevent large amounts of water from infiltrating into surrounding soils; and (2) in areas with significant elevation changes, designing BRCs deeper than the typical 0.6-1.2 m increases the feasibility of retrofits and provides substantial water quality and quantity benefits. DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000388. (C) 2011 American Society of Civil Engineers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available