4.2 Article

High Rates of Ammonia Removal in Experimental Oxygen-Activated Nitrification Wetland Mesocosms

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
Volume 135, Issue 10, Pages 972-979

Publisher

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000053

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Department of the Interior, U. S. Geological Survey, through the State of Washington Water Research Center [06HQGR0126]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

While constructed treatment wetlands are very efficient at polishing nitrate from secondary effluent, they are much less effective at removing ammonia. A key factor that limits ammonia oxidation via biological nitrification in vegetated wetlands is low levels of dissolved oxygen. This study evaluated the effectiveness of side-stream oxygenation to enhance ammonia removal in replicate surface-flow experimental mesocosms containing wetland sediment and plants (Typha spp.). Mesocosms had a water volume of 29.5 L, a hydraulic retention time of 5 days, and a hydraulic loading rate of 4.3 cm/d, and were loaded with synthetic secondary effluent contain 10 mg-N/L of ammonia. Relative to nonoxygenated controls, oxygenation increased ammonia removal rates by an order of magnitude. Areal removal rates increased from 40 mg-N/m(2)/d to 450 mg-N/m(2)/d, concentration removal efficiency increased from 10 to 95%, and area-based first-order removal rates increased from < 2 m/year to 50-75 m/year. Ammonia removal rates in oxygenated mesocosms were 2- to 4-fold higher than rates reported for full-scale constructed wetlands treating secondary effluent. Results show that oxygen-activated nitrification wetlands, a hybrid of conventional oxygenation technology and wetland ecotechnology, hold promise in economically enhancing rates of ammonia removal and shrinking the wetland area needed to polish ammonia-dominated secondary effluent. Further study is needed to confirm that oxygenation can promote high rates of ammonia removal at the field scale.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available