4.1 Article

TESTING OF CHLORELLA/SCENEDESMUS MICROALGAE CONSORTIA FOR REMEDIATION OF WASTEWATER, CO2 MITIGATION AND ALGAE BIOMASS FEASIBILITY FOR LIPID PRODUCTION

Journal

Publisher

VILNIUS GEDIMINAS TECH UNIV
DOI: 10.3846/16486897.2013.911182

Keywords

phycoremediation; wastewater; microalgae; biomass; oil accumulation

Funding

  1. EU (European Regional Development Fund) through the Baltic Sea Region Programme project, Sustainable Uses of Baltic Marine Resources (SUBMARINER) [055]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Industry, transport and unsustainable agriculture result in the increased quantity of wastewater, release of nutrients and emission of carbon dioxide that promotes eutrophication of water bodies and global climate change. The application of micro algae for phycoremediation, their biomass use for human needs may increase sustainability and have a positive effect on the regional development. The experiments were carried out in order to establish the feasibility of treating the local municipal wastewater with microalgae consortia and their biomass potential for biofuel production. The results revealed that Ch/orella/Scenedesmus consortium eliminated up to 99.7-99.9% of inorganic phosphorus and up to 88.6-96.4% of inorganic nitrogen from the wastewater within three weeks. The ammonium removal was more efficient than that of nitrate. Chlorella algae grew better in diluted, while Scenedesmus - in the concentrated wastewater. The consortium treated wastewater more efficiently than a single species. The maximum biomass (3.04 g/L) of algal consortium was estimated in concentrated wastewater. Algae accumulated 0.65-1.37 g of CO2/L per day in their biomass. Thus, Chlorellal Scenedesmus consortium is a promising tool for nutrients elimination from the local wastewater under the climatic conditions specific to Lithuania. However, none of the two species were able to accumulate lipids under the nitrogen starvation conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available