4.4 Article

Anisotropic Critical State Theory: Role of Fabric

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS
Volume 138, Issue 3, Pages 263-275

Publisher

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000324

Keywords

Critical state; Fabric; Anisotropy; Soil mechanics; State parameter

Funding

  1. European Research Council under the European Community [22805_MEDIGRA, 290963_SOMEF]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An Anisotropic Critical State Theory (ACST) for granular media is presented, which accounts for the role of anisotropic fabric at critical state. It enhances the requirements of critical values for the stress and void ratio of the classical Critical State Theory (CST) by an additional requirement of critical value for an appropriate measure of fabric-anisotropy. A fabric tensor and its evolution toward a critical value, norm-wise and direction-wise, is introduced motivated by micromechanical and experimental studies. On the basis of a scalar-valued fabric-anisotropy variable relating the evolving fabric tensor to the loading direction, a dilatancy state line is defined in the void ratio-pressure plane which determines a dilatancy state parameter zeta that characterizes the contracting or dilating trends of the current state. When the fabric-anisotropy variable reaches its critical state value, the dilatancy state line becomes identical to the critical state line and the zeta identical to the well-known state parameter psi. An immediate corollary is the uniqueness of the critical state line, for which a thermodynamic proof is provided on the basis of the Gibbs condition. Static liquefaction is obtained when zeta=0 with the stress ratio reaching its critical value but not the void ratio and the fabric. Simulations of anisotropic material response by a triaxial model are used to illustrate the effectiveness of the novel ACST. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000324. (C) 2012 American Society of Civil Engineers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available