4.4 Article

Evaluation of the Buckling Load of an Elliptic Paraboloid Cable-Braced Grid Shell Using the Continuum Analogy

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS-ASCE
Volume 138, Issue 12, Pages 1468-1478

Publisher

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000454

Keywords

Cable-braced grid shell; Initial imperfection; Stability; Continuum analogy

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [50908044]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building Science of South China University of Technology [2011KA05]
  3. Jiang Su provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [SBK201123270]
  4. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A cable-braced grid shell is a new type of single-layer latticed shell suitable for glass roofs. Compared with traditional single-layer latticed shells, this new type of shell has a unique mesh shape (planar quadrilateral mesh), mesh form (steel and crossing cables), and surface shape (from the translation surface method). The grid shell is a single-layer latticed structure, and therefore stability is one of the key factors in the structural design. Therefore, in this paper, an elliptic paraboloid cable-braced grid shell with imperfections is used as an example with which to determine the formulas for the buckling load based on the continuum analogy. The main contents of this paper include the formula for the linear buckling load of an elliptic paraboloid cable-braced grid shell with imperfections, which is determined based on the continuum analogy. The equivalent rigidity for the cable-braced grid shell is then determined, and the effect of the cables on the shear rigidity is discussed. Finally, the formula for the linear buckling load is verified with numerical examples, and the errors are analyzed and a corresponding correction factor is given. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000454. (C) 2012 American Society of Civil Engineers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available