4.4 Article

Response Surface-Based Finite-Element-Model Updating Using Structural Static Responses

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS-ASCE
Volume 137, Issue 4, Pages 248-257

Publisher

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000223

Keywords

Finite element method; Displacement; Design; Parameters; Structural response; Bridges; girder; Finite-element-model updating; Static displacement; Response surface methodology; Uniform design; Parameter scope shrinking

Funding

  1. China 863 Program [2009AA11Z101]
  2. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20090162110051]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With the aid of the response surface methodology, which is a combination of mathematical and statistical techniques, this paper presents a method for updating a finite-element model based on the measured static responses of structures. Unlike in the traditional model updating procedure, original finite-element models are replaced with response surface models constructed using the uniform design. By this means the complexity of a structure can be easily expressed by explicit functions with low dimensions. A parameter scope shrinking technique is also proposed to construct response surface models. The proposed method is verified against a numerical beam and an experimental full-scale continuous box-girder bridge. It is demonstrated that the proposed response surface-based finite-element-model updating in structural statics has the advantages of easy implementation, high cost-efficiency, and adequate updating accuracy. Once the response surface model that is formulated explicitly is constructed, no finite-element calculation is required in each optimization iteration during updating. Therefore, such finite-element model updating can be easily implemented in practice with available commercial finite-element analysis packages. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000223. (C) 2011 American Society of Civil Engineers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available