4.6 Article

Preferential oxidation of CO in excess of H2 on Pt/CeO2-Nb2O5 catalysts

Journal

APPLIED CATALYSIS A-GENERAL
Volume 492, Issue -, Pages 201-211

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2014.12.032

Keywords

Platinum; Niobia; Ceria; DRIFT; PROX

Funding

  1. MINECO (Spain) [MAT2010-21147]
  2. Generalitat Valenciana [PROMETEO/2009/002-FEDER, PROMETEOII/2014/004-FEDER]
  3. MINECO [RYC-2012-11427]
  4. CNPq - Brazil

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A series of CeO2-Nb2O5 mixed oxides with different Nb content, as well as the pure oxides, have been synthesized by co-precipitation with excess urea. These materials have been used as supports for platinum catalysts, with [Pt(NH3)(4)](NO3)(2) as precursor. Both supports and catalysts have been characterized by several techniques: N2 physisorption at 77K, X-ray diffraction, Raman spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, UV-vis spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, temperature-programmed reduction and temperature-programmed desorption (CO and H-2), and their catalytic behaviour has been determined in the PROX reaction, both with an ideal gas mixture (CO, O-2 and H-2) and in simulated reformate gas containing CO2 and H2O. Raman spectroscopy analysis has shown the likely substitution of some Ce4+ cations by Nb5+ to some extent in supports with low niobium contents. Moreover, the presence of Nb in the supports hinders their ability to adsorb CO and to oxidize it to CO2. However, an improvement of the catalytic activity for CO oxidation is obtained by adding Nb to the support, although the Pt/Nb2O5 catalyst shows very low activity. The best results are found with the Pt/0.7CeO(2)-0.3Nb(2)O(5) catalyst, which shows a high CO conversion (85%) and a high yield (around 0.6) after a reduction treatment at 523 K. The effect of the presence of CO2 and H2O in the feed has also been determined. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available