Journal
OBESITY SURGERY
Volume 25, Issue 10, Pages 1788-1795Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11695-015-1621-y
Keywords
Bariatric surgery; Gastric bypass; Malabsorptive gastric bypass; Distal gastric bypass; Malabsorptive procedure; Laparoscopic bariatric surgery; Randomized controlled trial
Categories
Funding
- South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Proximal Roux-en-Y gastric bypass may not ensure adequate weight loss in superobese patients. Bypassing a longer segment of the small bowel may increase weight loss. The objective of the study was to compare the perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic proximal and distal gastric bypass in a double-blind randomized controlled trial of superobese patients. The study was conducted at two public tertiary care obesity centers in Norway. Patients with body mass index (BMI) 50-60 kg/m(2) were randomly assigned to a proximal (150 cm alimentary limb) or a distal (150 cm common channel) gastric bypass. The biliopancreatic limb was 50 cm in both operations. Patients and follow-up personnel were blinded to the type of procedure. Thirty-day outcomes including complications are reported. We operated on 115 patients, of whom two were excluded at surgery, leaving 56 and 57 patients in the proximal group and distal group, respectively. The median (range) operating time was 72 (36-151) and 101 (59-227) min, respectively (p < 0.001). Two distal procedures were converted to laparotomy during the primary procedure. Median length of hospital stay was 2 (1-4) days in the proximal group and 2 (1-24) days in the distal group. The number of patients with complications and complications categorized according to the Contracted Accordion classification did not differ significantly. However, all six reoperations were performed in the distal group, of which three were completed by laparoscopy (p = 0.01 between groups). There were no deaths. In superobese patients with BMI between 50 and 60 kg/m(2), distal gastric bypass was associated with longer operating time and more severe complications resulting in reoperation than proximal gastric bypass.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available