4.4 Article

Association of Clinical and Radiographic Features with Perinephric Sticky Fat

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages 370-373

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT INC
DOI: 10.1089/end.2012.0205

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCATS NIH HHS [UL1 TR000117, UL1 TR001998] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCRR NIH HHS [UL1 RR033173] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and Purpose: The discovery of thick, adherent, perinephric sticky fat (PSF) is relatively common during open or laparoscopic retroperitoneal surgery. To our knowledge, however, there has been no previous analysis of clinical or radiographic features associated with the development of PSF or of perioperative outcomes for those patients in whom it is found. Our objective is to analyze potential predictive features and determine whether there is any effect on clinical or pathologic outcomes for patients with perinephric sticky fat. Patients and Methods: Patients undergoing partial nephrectomy or laparoscopic cryoablation with available preoperative imaging were identified from 2005 to 2011. Operative records were reviewed to identify patients with and without PSF. Preoperative images and medical records were examined to obtain patient data regarding potential predictors as well as clinical and pathologic outcomes. Results: A total of 29 patients were identified-16 with PSF and 13 controls. Statistically significant factors associated with PSF included sex, tumor size, presence of perinephric stranding, tumor >50% exophytic, and thickness of perinephric fat (P < 0.05). Median total operative time for patients with sticky fat was nearly 40 minutes longer than the control group (228 min vs 190 min, P < 0.05). All four (17%) patients with Fuhrman grade 3 or 4 renal-cell carcinoma were from the sticky fat group (P = 0.09). Conclusions: Despite the small sample size, multiple possible factors associated with perinephric sticky fat were identified and may provide guidance for future investigation of this phenomenon.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available