4.4 Article

The FECal Double-J: A Simplified Approach in the Management of Encrusted and Retained Ureteral Stents

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages 409-415

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/end.2008.0214

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: The management of the forgotten, encrusted, calcified (FECal) Double-J ureteral stents can represent one of the most difficult and challenging surgical conditions for the practicing urologist. We present a novel and simple grading system for the FECal stent and, taking into account our own experience and literature review, propose an algorithm in the management of the encrusted stent based on this new system. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of our stone database was performed from March 2000 to April 2007 revealing a total of nine patients presented with a FECal Double-J stent managed at our institution and included in our series for further analysis. Based on this population, our experience, and current surgical techniques, we designed a simplified grading system to universally define the retained indwelling FECal ureteral stents. Results: A total of nine patients with encrusted and retained ureteral stents were identified, graded, classified, and treated at our institution. Our population consisted of five women and four men with an average age of 54.4 years and average stent indwelling time of 11.44 months. We present our novel management algorithm based on our simplified FECal stent grading system. Conclusion: The management of the FECal ureteral stent represents a formidable challenge due to the need for a multimodal approach with advanced endourological techniques. Our proposed grading system and management algorithm provide a simplified and directed alternative for the surgical management dilemma of the encrusted retained ureteral stent.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available