4.5 Article

A Modified Resin Sealer: Physical and Antibacterial Properties

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS
Volume 44, Issue 10, Pages 1553-1557

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.06.016

Keywords

Dental cements; Enterococcus faecalis; modified direct contact test; nanoparticles; quaternary ammonium

Funding

  1. Foundation for Endodontics [1500596]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to investigate the physical and antibacterial properties of a resin sealer mixed with a quaternary ammonium compound, dimethylaminododecyl methacrylate (DMAHDM) and nanosilver (NAg). Methods: A pilot study was completed to determine the highest concentrations of DMAHDM and NAg that did not significantly alter the physical properties (setting time, flow, solubility, and dimensional change) of AH Plus (Dentsply Sirona, York, PA) when added to the sealer. These concentrations were selected to create a modified resin sealer (mAH Plus). A modified direct contact test evaluated antibacterial properties of AH Plus, DMAHDM + AH Plus, NAg + AH Plus, and mAH Plus at days 1, 7, and 14 against Enterococcus faecalis. Results: Concentrations of 2.5% DMAHDM and 0.15% NAg were added to AH Plus. The flow of mAH Plus was significantly decreased but still within American National Standards Institute/American Dental Association specifications. There were no significant differences in setting time, solubility, or dimensional change. On day 1, 0.15% NAg + AH Plus, 2.5% DMAHDM + AH Plus, and mAH Plus were significantly more effective against E. faecalis compared with AH Plus (P < .05). On days 7 through 14, 2.5% DMAHDM + AH Plus and mAH Plus continued to be significantly more antibacterial than AH Plus (P < .05). Conclusions: The addition of 0.15% NAg and 2.5% DMAHDM did not adversely affect the physical properties of AH Plus, and mAH Plus was significantly more antibacterial against E. faecalis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available