4.7 Article

All in the Family: Correlations Between Parents' and Adolescent Siblings' Weight and Weight-Related Behaviors

Journal

OBESITY
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages 833-839

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/oby.21036

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [R03 HD074677, R01 HL093247]
  2. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [R01 HL084064]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectiveTo examine whether and how parents' and adolescent siblings' weight and weight-related behaviors are correlated. Results will inform which family members may be important to include in adolescent obesity prevention interventions. MethodsData from two linked population-based studies, EAT 2010 and F-EAT, were used for cross-sectional analyses. Parents (n=58; 91% females; mean age=41.7 years) and adolescent siblings (sibling #1 n=58, 50% girls, mean age=14.3 years; sibling #2 n=58, 64% girls, mean age=14.8 years) were socioeconomically and racially/ethnically diverse. ResultsSome weight-related behaviors between adolescent siblings were significantly positively correlated (i.e., fast food consumption, breakfast frequency, sedentary patterns, p<0.05). There were no significant correlations between parents' weight and weight-related behaviors and adolescent siblings' same behaviors. Some of the significant correlations found between adolescent siblings' weight-related behaviors were statistically different from correlations between parents' and adolescent siblings' weight-related behaviors. ConclusionsAlthough not consistently, adolescent siblings' weight-related behaviors were significantly correlated as compared with parents' and adolescent siblings' weight-related behaviors. It may be important to consider including siblings in adolescent obesity prevention interventions or in recommendations healthcare providers give to adolescents regarding their weight and weight-related behaviors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available