4.5 Article

Distribution of Mast Cells and Macrophages and Expression of Interleukin-6 in Periapical Cysts

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS
Volume 40, Issue 1, Pages 63-68

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.09.037

Keywords

Interleukin 6; macrophage; mast cell; periapical cyst

Funding

  1. FAPERJ

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Mast cells and macrophages are important components of the inflammatory infiltrate found in inflammatory periapical diseases. Several cytokines participate in the mechanisms of inflammation, tissue repair, and bone resorption associated with periapical cysts. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the distribution of mast cells and macrophages and the expression of interleukin-6 (IL-6) in periapical cysts. Methods: Thirty periapical cysts were selected for the study, and clinical, demographic, and gross information from the cases was obtained from the laboratory records. Five-micrometer sections stained with hematoxylin-eosin were reviewed for analysis of the microscopic features of the cysts, and 3-mu m sections on silanized slides were used for immunohistochemical reactions with anti-tryptase, anti-CD68, and anti IL-6. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the mean number of mast cells and macrophages when comparing superficial and deep regions of the fibrous capsule of the cysts. Mean number of mast cells on the superficial region of the fibrous capsule was higher in cysts showing intense superficial inflammation and exocytosis. Macrophages were more commonly found in areas showing IL-6 expression, and IL-6 was less expressed in deep regions of the fibrous capsule in cysts showing greater gross volume. Conclusions: The results reinforced the participation of mast cells and macrophages in the pathogenesis of periapical cysts and suggested that IL-6 is not the major bone resorption mediator in larger periapical cysts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available