4.7 Article

Exercise improves adipose function and inflammation and ameliorates fatty liver disease in obese diabetic mice

Journal

OBESITY
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages 1845-1855

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/oby.21170

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council's (NHMRC) [585411, 1044288, 102818]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectiveAdipose inflammation and dysfunction underlie metabolic obesity. Exercise improves glycemic control and metabolic indices, but effects on adipose function and inflammation are less clear. Accordingly, it was hypothesized that exercise improves adipose morphometry to reduce adipose inflammation in hyperphagic obese mice. MethodsAlms1 mutant foz/foz mice housed in pairs were fed an atherogenic or chow diet; half the cages were fitted with a computer-monitored wheel for voluntary exercise. Insulin-induced AKT-phosphorylation, adipocyte size distribution, and inflammatory recruitment were studied in visceral versus subcutaneous depots, and severity of fatty liver disease was determined. ResultsExercise prevented obesity and diabetes development in chow-fed foz/foz mice and delayed their onset in atherogenic-fed counterparts. Insulin-stimulated phospho-AKT levels in muscle were improved with exercise, but not in adipose or liver. Exercise suppressed adipose inflammatory recruitment, particularly in visceral adipose, associated with an increased number of small adipocyte subpopulations, and enhanced expression of beige adipocyte factor PRDM16 in subcutaneous fat. In atherogenic-fed foz/foz mice liver, exercise suppressed development of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and related liver fibrosis. ConclusionsExercise confers metabo-protective effects in atherogenic-fed hyperphagic mice by preventing early onset of obesity and diabetes in association with enhanced muscle insulin sensitivity, improved adipose morphometry, and suppressed adipose and liver inflammation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available