4.5 Article

Inhibition of Endogenous Dentin Matrix Metalloproteinases by Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS
Volume 38, Issue 1, Pages 62-65

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.09.005

Keywords

Dentin; EDTA; hybrid layer; matrix metalloproteinases

Funding

  1. NIDCR [R01 DE015306-06]
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DENTAL & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH [R01DE015306] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Endogenous dentin matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) contribute to extracellular collagen matrix degradation in hybrid layers after adhesive dentin bonding procedures. Endodontic irrigants, including chlorhexidine and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), might help protect the hybrid layer from this process. The objective of the present study was to determine the exposure time necessary for EDTA to inactivate endogenous MMP activity in human dentin. Methods: Dentin beams (2 x 1 x 3 mm) were prepared from midcoronal dentin of extracted third molars. The beams were demineralized in 10 wt% phosphoric acid, which also activated endogenous MMPs, and were divided into 4 experimental groups on the basis of exposure time to 17% EDTA (0, 1, 2, or 5 minutes). A generic colorimetric MMP assay measured MMP activity via absorbance at 412 nm. Data were evaluated by Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance, followed by Dunn pair-wise comparisons at alpha = 0.05. Results: All exposure times resulted in significant inhibition (P <.001) compared with unexposed controls. Specifically, percent inhibition for 1-, 2-, and 5-minute exposure times was 55.1% +/- 21.5%, 72.8% +/- 11.7%, and 74.7% +/- 19.7%, respectively. Conclusions: Seventeen percent EDTA significantly inhibits endogenous MMP activity of human dentin within 1-2 minutes. This might minimize hybrid layer degradation after resin bonding procedures in the root canal space. (J Endod 2012;38:62-65)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available