Journal
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS
Volume 36, Issue 7, Pages 1226-1229Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.03.011
Keywords
Apical transportation; hybrid technique; rotary instrument; rotary instrumentation
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate apical transportation of 2 rotary file systems and 2 hybrid rotary instrumentation sequences. Methods: One hundred twenty-four mesiobuccal canals of extracted molars were instrumented by 4 nickel-titanium rotary sequences. Group PF (n = 32) was instrumented with Profile Series 29 to size #6 (#36/.06) at working length (WL). Group ES (n = 28) used Endo Sequence to #35/.06. Group PFLS (n = 32) used Profile Series 29 followed by Light Speed in a hybrid technique to a final size #50. Group PTLS (n = 32) was instrumented with ProTaper and additional enlargement with Light Speed to #50 in a hybrid technique. A double-digital radiographic technique was used to measure canal transportation at 0.5-5.0 mm from WL. Statistical analysis was carried out with one-way analysis of variance. Results: There was no statistically significant difference for apical transportation between the groups at any level from the WL (0.5 mm, P = .74; 1.0 mm, P = .09; 2.0 mm, P = .29; 3.0 mm, P = .65; 4.0 mm, P = .21; 5.0 mm, P = .12). Conclusions: indicated that combining different file systems does not lead to increased levels of apical transportation. Hybrid instrumentation might be a valid alternative to achieve larger apical diameters without higher risk of procedural errors. (J Endod 2010;36:1226-1229)
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available