4.5 Article

Early-onset GH deficiency results in spatial memory impairment in mid-life and is prevented by GH supplementation

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 204, Issue 1, Pages 31-36

Publisher

BIOSCIENTIFICA LTD
DOI: 10.1677/JOE-09-0323

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute of Aging [P01 AG011370]
  2. ENM [R01 AG26607]
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [P01AG011370, R01AG020572, R01AG026607] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

GH levels increase to high concentrations immediately before puberty then progressively decline with age. GH deficiency (GHD) originating in childhood is treated with GH supplementation to foster somatic development during adolescence. It is not clear if or how early GH replacement affects memory in adulthood, or whether it can prevent the cognitive deficits commonly observed in adults with child-hood-onset GHD. Rats homozygous for the Dw-4 mutation (dwarf) do not exhibit the normal increase in GH at 4 weeks of age when GH levels normally rise and are used to model childhood or early-onset GHD(EOGHD). One group of these rats was injected with GH from 4 to 14 weeks of age to model GH supplementation during adolescence with GHD beginning in adulthood (adult-onset GHD; AOGHD). Another group received GH from 4 weeks throughout the lifespan to model normal lifespan GH (GH-replete). Age-matched, Dw-4 heterozygous rats (HZ) do not express the dwarf phenotype and were used as controls. At 8 and 18 months of age, spatial learning in the water maze was assessed. At 8 months of age all experimental groups were equally proficient. However, at 18 months of age, the EOGHD group had poor spatial learning compared to the AOGHD, GH-replete, and HZ groups. Our data indicate that GHD during adolescence has negative effects on learning and memory that emerge by middle-age unless prevented by GH supplementation. Journal of Endocrinology (2010) 204, 31-36

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available