4.6 Article

Normal age-dependent values of serum insulin growth factor-I: Results from a healthy Italian population

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages 445-449

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/BF03346389

Keywords

IGF-I; normal range; healthy subjects

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Serum IGF-I levels were measured in 547 non-hypopituitaric, non-acromegalic healthy subjects of both sexes in Italy to develop reference values in relation to age and sex. Participant subjects were stratified in three age classes (2539, 40-59 and >= 60 yr) and IGF-I assay was carried out by double-antibody radio immunoassay. Pearson's correlation coefficient between age and IGF-I values was calculated by sex and pre-defined age ranges. IGF-I levels significantly decreased with age (p<0.001, Kruskal-Wallis test) while sex was not a significant factor. The median IGF-I levels were 206 ng/ml in the 25-39 yr range, 147 ng/ml in the 40-59 yr range and 103 ng/ml in the >= 60 yr range. Pearson's correlation coefficient confirmed the negative correlation between age and IGF-I levels in the total sample of subjects (r=-0.529). The r coefficient between age and IGF-I levels did not differ between sexes (r=-0.570 in males and r=-0.529 in females), thus reflecting no sex-effect on IGF-I levels decline over years. No correlations were found in the 25-39 yr range (r=-0.036) or in the 40-59 yr range (r=-0.080) either, while in subjects aged >60 yr, IGF-I levels tended to further decrease with increased age (r=0.389). Ranges of normal values set at the 2.5(th)-97.5(th) percentile in the three age ranges were 95.6-366.7 ng/ml between 25 and 39 yr, 60.8-297.7 ng/ml between 40 and 59 yr and 34.5-219.8 ng/ml in subjects aged >= 60 yr. This study may contribute to the development of age-specific reference ranges for IGF-I determination in serum of normal subjects of both sexes in Italy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available