4.5 Article

Resistant starch and protein intake enhances fat oxidation and feelings of fullness in lean and overweight/obese women

Journal

NUTRITION JOURNAL
Volume 14, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12937-015-0104-2

Keywords

Resistant starch; High protein diets; Fat oxidation; Obesity; Satiety and hunger

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Diets high in either resistant starch or protein have been shown to aid in weight management. We examined the effects of meals high in non-resistant or resistant starch with and without elevated protein intake on substrate utilization, energy expenditure, and satiety in lean and overweight/obese women. Methods: Women of varying levels of adiposity consumed one of four pancake test meals in a single-blind, randomized crossover design: 1) waxy maize (control) starch (WMS); 2) waxy maize starch and whey protein (WMS +WP); 3) resistant starch (RS); or 4) RS and whey protein (RS+WP). Results: Total post-prandial energy expenditure did not differ following any of the four test meals (WMS = 197.9 +/- 8.9; WMS+WP = 188 +/- 8.1; RS = 191.9 +/- 8.9; RS+WP = 195.8 +/- 8.7, kcals/180 min), although the combination of RS +WP, but not either intervention alone, significantly increased (P < 0.01) fat oxidation (WMS = 89.5 +/- 5.4; WMS+WP = 84.5 +/- 7.2; RS = 97.4 +/- 5.4; RS+WP = 107.8 +/- 5.4, kcals/180 min). Measures of fullness increased (125 % vs. 45 %) and hunger decreased (55 % vs. 16 %) following WP supplemented versus non-whey conditions (WMS+ WP, RS+WP vs. WMS, RS), whereas circulating hunger and satiety factors were not different among any of the test meals. However, peptide YY (PYY) was significantly elevated at 180 min following RS+WP meal. Conclusions: The combined consumption of dietary resistant starch and protein increases fat oxidation, PYY, and enhances feelings of satiety and fullness to levels that may be clinically relevant if maintained under chronic conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available