4.5 Article

RF Power Effect on the Properties of Sputtered ZnO Films for Channel Layer Applications in Thin-Film Transistors

Journal

JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC MATERIALS
Volume 41, Issue 7, Pages 1962-1969

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11664-012-1994-9

Keywords

Highly resistive zinc oxide films; thin-film transistor; RF power; magnetron sputtering

Funding

  1. CONACYT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ZnO films were processed by radiofrequency (RF) magnetron sputtering under argon gas environment at room temperature, varying the RF power (90 W, 100 W, 150 W, and 200 W), on p-Si/SiO2 substrates. Structural, morphological, and electrical characteristics of the ZnO films were determined using several experimental techniques, and they showed a clear relationship with the RF power. All the ZnO films exhibited a hexagonal wurtzite polycrystalline structure with (002) preferred orientation. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) revealed the formation of grains or clusters as a result of the accumulation of nanoparticles, and the grain size increased with increasing power. An ascending trend of the root-mean-square surface roughness of the films with increasing power was also observed. ZnO film thickness and refractive index were determined by spectroscopy ellipsometry. In agreement with AFM results, the observed increase of refractive index from 2.15 to 2.44 was the result of improved film compactness on increasing the deposition power. The electrical resistivity ranged from 3.5 x 10(3) abroken vertical bar-cm for ZnO film deposited at 200 W to 5 x 10(7) abroken vertical bar-cm for that deposited at 100 W. The sputtered ZnO films were employed as the active channel layer in thin-film transistors, and the impact of the deposition power on device performance was studied. As the power was increased, the field-effect mobility increased from similar to 0.1 cm(2)/V s to 4.2 cm(2)/V s, the threshold voltage decreased from 33.5 V to 10.7 V, and the I (on)/I (off) ratio decreased from 10(6) to 10(2).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available