4.1 Article

Ultrafast soft X-ray scattering and reference-enhanced diffractive imaging of weakly scattering nanoparticles

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.elspec.2008.06.004

Keywords

Soft-X-ray free-electron-laser; Spherical nanoparticles; X-ray diffractive imaging

Categories

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy [W-7405-Eng-48]
  2. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory [05-SI-003]
  3. National Center for Electron Microscopy
  4. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  5. Stanford Linear Accelerator Center [DE-AC02-76-SF00515]
  6. European Union (TUIXS)
  7. Swedish Research Councils
  8. DFG-Cluster of Excellence through the Munich-Centre for Advanced Photonics
  9. [DE-AC52-07NA27344]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report the first successful reconstruction of the real space image from coherent X-ray diffraction patterns of membrane-supported nanoparticles using single ultrafast pulses. The particles consisted of 145-nm spherical polystyrene spheres that were size-selected by differential mobility analysis. We investigated the dependence of signal intensity on the number of spherical nanoparticles irradiated by single ultrafast pulses at the FLASH FEL facility. We demonstrate detection of as few as two 145-nm diameter particles irradiated by a single 32 nm fs-long FLASH pulse focused to 2.4Jcm(-2). In this case the noise in the diffraction pattern. due to photon-counting statistics and scattering from the supporting silicon nitride membrane, was the largest contributor to the recorded intensity. We were able to reconstruct high-resolution images of the nanoparticles using a strong scattering reference object to aid the phase retrieval of the coherent diffraction pattern. This method of reference-enhanced diffractive imaging may allow the imaging of weakly scattering objects at FLASH and other future X-ray FEL sources. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available