4.3 Article

Internal consistency and test-retest reliability of an instrumented functional reaching task using wireless electromyographic sensors

Journal

JOURNAL OF ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND KINESIOLOGY
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages 593-600

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.05.011

Keywords

Stand-arm reaching; Flexion; Abduction; Electromyography; Acceleration; Reliability

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this study was to establish the internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the electromyographic and accelerometric data sampled from the prime movers of the dominant arm during an antigravity, within-arm's length stand-reaching task without trunk restraint. Ten healthy young adults participated in two experimental sessions, approximately 7-10 days apart. During each session, subjects performed 15 trials of both a flexion- and an abduction-reaching task. Surface EMG and acceleration using wireless sensors were sampled from the anterior and middle deltoid. Reliability was established using Cronbach's alpha, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC 2, k) and standard error of measurements (SEM) for electromyographic reaction time, burst duration and normalized amplitude along with peak acceleration. Results indicated high degrees of inter-trial and test-retest reliability for flexion (Cronbach's alpha range = 0.92-0.99; ICC range = 0.82-0.92) as well as abduction (Cronbach's alpha range = 0.94-0.99; ICC range = 0.81-0.94) reaching. The SEM associated with response variables for flexion and abduction ranged from 1.55-3.26% and 3.33-3.95% of means, respectively. Findings from this study revealed that electromyographic and accelerometric data collected from prime movers of the arm during the relatively functional stand-reaching task were highly reproducible. Given its high reliability and portability, the proposed test could have applications in clinical and laboratory settings to quantify upper limb function. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available