4.3 Article

Neuromuscular fatigue during dynamic maximal strength and hypertrophic resistance loadings

Journal

JOURNAL OF ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND KINESIOLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages 356-362

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2011.12.009

Keywords

Neuromuscular fatigue; Dynamic loading; EMG amplitude; Median frequency

Funding

  1. David Health Solutions Ltd, Finland
  2. National Doctoral Program of Musculoskeletal Disorders and Biomaterials
  3. Ellen and Artturi Nyyssonen Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this study was to compare the acute neuromuscular fatigue during dynamic maximal strength and hypertrophic loadings, known to cause different adaptations underlying strength gain during training. Thirteen healthy, untrained males performed two leg press loadings, one week apart, consisting of 15 sets of 1 repetition maximum (MAX) and 5 sets of 10 repetition maximums (HYP). Concentric load and muscle activity, electromyography (EMG) amplitude and median frequency, was assessed throughout each set. Additionally, maximal bilateral isometric force and muscle activity was assessed pre-, mid-, and up to 30 min post-loading. Concentric load during MAX was decreased after set 10 (P < 0.05), while the load was maintained throughout HYP. Both loadings caused large reductions in maximal isometric force (MAX = -30 +/- 6.4% vs. HYP = -48 +/- 9.7%, P < 0.001). The decreased concentric and isometric strength during MAX loading was accompanied by reduced EMG amplitude (P < 0.05). Conversely, hypertrophic loading caused decreased median frequency only during isometric contractions (P < 0.01). During concentric contractions, EMG amplitude increased and median frequency decreased in HYP (P < 0.01). Our results indicate reduced neural drive during MAX loading and more complex changes in muscle activity during HYP loading. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available