4.3 Article

Effect of experimental low back pain on neuromuscular control of the trunk in healthy volunteers and patients with chronic low back pain

Journal

JOURNAL OF ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND KINESIOLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages 774-781

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2011.05.004

Keywords

Electromyography; Lumbopelvic rhythm; Low back pain; Experimental pain; Flexion relaxation phenomenon

Funding

  1. Chaire de Recherche en Chiropratique FRCQ-Systeme Platinum
  2. Canadian Chiropractic Association

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Studies of electromyographic (EMG) activity and lumbopelvic rhythm have led to a better understanding of neuromuscular alterations in chronic low back pain (cLBP) patients. Whether these changes reflect adaptations to chronic pain or are induced by acute pain is still unclear. This work aimed to assess the effects of experimental LBP on lumbar erector spinae (LES) EMG activity and lumbopelvic kinematics during a trunk flexion-extension task in healthy volunteers and LBP patients. The contribution of disability to these effects was also examined. Twelve healthy participants and 14 cLBP patients performed flexion-extension tasks in three conditions; control, innocuous heat and noxious heat, applied on the skin over L5 or T7. The results indicated that noxious heat at L5 evoked specific increases in LES activity during static full trunk flexion and extension, irrespective of participants' group. Kinematic data suggested that LBP patients adopted a different movement strategy than controls when noxious heat was applied at the L5 level. Besides, high disability was associated with less kinematic changes when approaching and leaving full flexion. These results indicate that experimental pain can induce neuromechanical alterations in cLBP patients and healthy volunteers, and that higher disability in patients is associated with decreased movement pattern changes. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available