4.4 Article

Praseodymium-cerium oxide thin film cathodes: Study of oxygen reduction reaction kinetics

Journal

JOURNAL OF ELECTROCERAMICS
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages 62-69

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10832-011-9678-z

Keywords

Ceria; Three-way catalyst; Oxygen storage; Oxygen separation; Permeation membrane mixed ionic electronic conduction; Solid oxide fuel cell

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation Materials World Network
  2. Universitat Bayreuth, Germany [DMR-0908627]
  3. I2CNER
  4. Division Of Materials Research
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0908627] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Praseodymium-Cerium Oxide (PrxCe1-xO2-delta; PCO), a potential three way catalyst oxygen storage material and solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) cathode, exhibits surprisingly high levels of oxygen nonstoichiometry, even under oxidizing (e.g. air) conditions, resulting in mixed ionic electronic conductivity (MIEC). In this study we examine the redox kinetics of dense PCO thin films using impedance spectroscopy, for x = 0.01, 0.10 and 0.20, over the temperature range of 550 to 670A degrees C, and the oxygen partial pressure range of 10(-4) to 1 atm O-2. The electrode impedance was observed to be independent of electrode thickness and inversely proportional to electrode area, pointing to surface exchange rather than bulk diffusion limited kinetics. The large electrode capacitance (10(-2)F) was found to be consistent with an expected large electrochemically induced change in stoichiometry for x = 0.1 and x = 0.2 PCO. The PCO films showed surprisingly rapid oxygen exchange kinetics, comparable to other high performance SOFC cathode materials, from which values for the surface exchange coefficient, k (q) , were calculated. This study confirms the suitability of PCO as a model MIEC cathode material compatible with both zirconia and ceria based solid oxide electrolytes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available