4.7 Article

Application of channel flow double electrode to the study on gold dissolution during potential cycling in sulfuric acid solution

Journal

JOURNAL OF ELECTROANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 665, Issue -, Pages 33-37

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2011.11.010

Keywords

Gold dissolution; PEMFC; Channel flow double electrode; EPMA; Potential cycling

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT)
  2. Global COE on Multidisciplinary Education and Research Center for Energy Science, Tokyo Institute of Technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The applicability of a channel flow double electrode (CFDE) as an in situ monitoring method of gold dissolution during potential cycling in 0.5 M H2SO4 solution at 25 degrees C was investigated. In the CFDE, Au ions (Aun+) dissolved from a gold working electrode were detected by reducing them to Au on collector electrode (Au/Pt) which was placed at the downstream. The detection of the Au dissolution was confirmed by EPMA analysis of the collector electrode (Pt) surface. In anodic scan, a rise of the collector current above 1.35 V clearly indicated gold dissolution. Initially, the dissolution increased with increased anodic potential, but later limiting dissolution was observed above 1.55 V. The collector current, in the cathodic scan, clearly showed a reduction peak which was confirmed by EPMA analysis to be due to the gold deposition. On the basis of collector current, the rate and potential range of the Au dissolution are discussed. The amount of gold dissolved was found to be 4.2 mu C cm(-2) cycle(-1) when potential cycling from 0.4 to 1.6 V in 0.5 M H2SO4. Thus, upon meticulous and exhaustive deaeration, channel flow double electrode was found to be a highly sensitive method applicable to monitor the dissolution behavior of even the noblest element gold. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available