4.6 Article

Susceptibility to Selected Insecticides and Risk Assessment in the Insect Egg Parasitoid Trichogramma confusum (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae)

Journal

JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY
Volume 106, Issue 1, Pages 142-149

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1603/EC12313

Keywords

Trichogramma spp.; chemical control; biological control; toxicity risk

Categories

Funding

  1. International Cooperation Fund [S2010GR0905]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2011AA100806]
  3. Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The parasitoid Trichogramma confusum Viggiani (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) is an important natural enemy of many lepidopterans throughout the world. Extensive toxicological tests have clarified the toxic effects of insecticides on trichogrammatids, but only few studies have examined these effects on T. confusum. Among the seven classes of tested chemicals, organophosphates and carbamates exhibited the highest intrinsic toxicity to the parasitoid with LC50 values ranging from 0.037 (0.030-0.046) to 0.29 (0.23-0.38) and from 0.17 (0.15-0.19) to 1.61 (1.45-1.79) mg AI L-1, respectively. They were followed by phenylpyrazoles, avermectins, pyrethroids, and neonicotinoids, which induced variable toxicity responses with LC50 values ranging from 0.63 to 45.26, 1.06-21.73, 3.89-19.36, and 0.24-754.2 mg AI L-1, respectively. In contrast, insect growth regulators (IGRs) showed the least toxicity to the parasitoid with LC50 values ranging from 3,907 (3,432 4,531) to 10,154 (8,857-12,143) mg AI L-1. A risk quotient analysis indicated that neonicotinoids (except thiamethoxam), avermectins, pyrethroids, IGRs, and phenylpyrazoles are safe, but organophosphates and carbamates are slightly to moderately or dangerously toxic to T. confusum. This study provides informative data for implementing both biological and chemical control strategies in integrated pest management of lepidopterans.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available