4.6 Article

Control of Grape Berry Moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in Relation to Oviposition Phenology

Journal

JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY
Volume 102, Issue 2, Pages 692-698

Publisher

ENTOMOLOGICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1603/029.102.0230

Keywords

phenology; Vitis; integrated pest management

Categories

Funding

  1. GREEEN
  2. USDA Crops at Risk Program
  3. National Grape Cooperative

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We monitored the phenology of oviposition by grape berry moth, Paralobesia viteana (Clemens) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), in grape (Vitis spp.) vineyards, to determine the optimal timing for control of this pest. Egg deposition was monitored throughout the growing season by visually inspection grape clusters twice weekly and counting the number of eggs. Male moths were captured on phenomone-baited traps during the same period. Two main periods of egg deposition were detected in all farms and years: the first period in June-July and the second period during August. These episodes of concentrated oviposition were separated by a brief period of low intensity but continous oviposition. The proportion of eggs laid during the first peak ranged from 9 to 35% of all eggs laid throughout the monitoring period at each site, whereas eggs laid during the second peak ranged from 43 to 78% of all eggs laid. From 49 to 99% of male moths were captured before or during the first peak in oviposition. In field trials with varying application timing of methoxyfenozide targeting the postbloom oviposition, a single application of this selective insecticide at approximate to 700 degree-days, or approximate to 12% of cumulative season-long oviposition, provided significant control of grape berry moth comparable with two applications of methoxyfenozide or a three-spray program with broad-spectrum insecticides. Use of predicted oviposition phenology and selective insecticides with long residual activity can improve protection of grapes against infestation by P. viteana.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available