4.6 Article

Likelihood inference for a nonstationary fractional autoregressive model

Journal

JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS
Volume 158, Issue 1, Pages 51-66

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2010.03.006

Keywords

Dickey-Fuller test; Fractional unit root; Likelihood inference

Funding

  1. Danish Social Sciences Research Council [2114-04-0001, 275-05-0220]
  2. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada [410-2009-0183]
  3. Center for Research in Econometric Analysis of Time Series (CREATES), Danish National Research Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper discusses model-based inference in an autoregressive model for fractional processes which allows the process to be fractional of order d or d-b. Fractional differencing involves infinitely many past values and because we are interested in nonstationary processes we model the data X-1, ..., X-T given the initial values X-n = 0, 1, ..., as is usually done. The initial values are not modeled but assumed to be bounded. This represents a considerable generalization relative to previous work where it is assumed that initial values are zero. For the statistical analysis we assume the conditional Gaussian likelihood and for the probability analysis we also condition on initial values but assume that the errors in the autoregressive model are i.i.d. with suitable moment conditions. We analyze the conditional likelihood and its derivatives as stochastic processes in the parameters, including d and b, and prove that they converge in distribution. We use these results to prove consistency of the maximum likelihood estimator ford. b in a large compact subset of {1/2 < b < d < infinity}, and to find the asymptotic distribution of the estimators and the likelihood ratio test of the associated fractional unit root hypothesis. The limit distributions contain the fractional Brownian motion of type II. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available