4.4 Article

Turbulent forced convection of Cu-water nanofluid in a heated tube: Improvement of the two-phase model

Journal

NUMERICAL HEAT TRANSFER PART A-APPLICATIONS
Volume 69, Issue 4, Pages 401-420

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10407782.2015.1081019

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. University of Malaya Research Grant (AFR - Frontier Science) [RP031C-15AFR]
  2. University of Malaya, Ministry of Higher Education High Impact Research [UM.C/HIR/MOHE/ENG/53]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compares the prediction of two types of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) models to investigate the turbulent forced convection of the Cu-water nanofluid in a tube with a constant heat flux on the tube wall. One of the CFD models is based on a single-phase (or homogeneous) model and the other is the Eulerian-Eulerian (two-fluid) two-phase model. The Reynolds number is between 10,000 and 25,000, whereas the volume fraction of the Cu particles is in the range of 0-1.5%. The results from the CFD models are compared with the results from experimental investigations in the literature. Both the single-phase and two-phase models overpredict the Nusselt number in most of the cases investigated. Unexpectedly, the two-phase model was found to be relatively less accurate than the single-phase model. The present study suggests a correction of the two-phase model in terms of selecting an appropriate effective conductivity of the solidus phase and this has resulted in a significant improvement in the predictions of the accuracy of the model. A correlation describing the effective conductivity of the solidus phase of Cu-water nanofluid as a function of the Reynolds number and particle concentrations is developed for use in the Eulerian-Eulerian two-phase model. To the best of our knowledge, such an improvement to a two-phase model has been presented for the first time.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available