4.8 Article

The Reactome pathway Knowledgebase

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 44, Issue D1, Pages D481-D487

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkv1351

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Human Genome Research Institute at the National Institutes of Health [U41 HG003751]
  2. BD2K grant [U54 GM114833]
  3. Ontario Research (GL2) Fund
  4. European Bioinformatics Institute (EBI)
  5. Centre for Therapeutic Target Validation (CTTV)
  6. National Institutes of Health [U41 HG003751]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Reactome Knowledgebase (www.reactome.org) provides molecular details of signal transduction, transport, DNA replication, metabolism and other cellular processes as an ordered network of molecular transformations-an extended version of a classic metabolic map, in a single consistent data model. Reactome functions both as an archive of biological processes and as a tool for discovering unexpected functional relationships in data such as gene expression pattern surveys or somatic mutation catalogues from tumour cells. Over the last two years we redeveloped major components of the Reactome web interface to improve usability, responsiveness and data visualization. A new pathway diagram viewer provides a faster, clearer interface and smooth zooming from the entire reaction network to the details of individual reactions. Tool performance for analysis of user datasets has been substantially improved, now generating detailed results for genome-wide expression datasets within seconds. The analysis module can now be accessed through a RESTFul interface, facilitating its inclusion in third party applications. A new overview module allows the visualization of analysis results on a genome-wide Reactome pathway hierarchy using a single screen page. The search interface now provides auto-completion as well as a faceted search to narrow result lists efficiently.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available