4.6 Article

The Role of Key Image Notes in CT Imaging Study Interpretation

Journal

JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages 366-372

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10278-010-9317-2

Keywords

Key image; PACS; RIS; CT

Funding

  1. Zhejiang Science and Technology bureau major international RD cooperation [2009C14035]
  2. Taizhou Science and Technology Program [ID 20072KY19]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of the study was to investigate the clinical effects of CT key image notes (KIN) in the interpretation of a CT image study. All experiments were approved by the ethics committee of the local district. Six experienced radiologists were equally divided into routine reporting (RR) group and KIN reporting (KIN) group. CT scans of each 100 consecutive cases before and after using KIN technique were randomly selected, and the reports were made by group RR and KIN, respectively. All the reports were again reviewed 3 months later by both groups. All the results with using or not using KIN were interpreted and reinterpreted after 3 months by six clinicians, who were experienced in picture archiving and communication system (PACS) applications and were equally divided into the clinical routine report group and the clinical KIN report group, respectively. The results were statistically analyzed; the time used in making a report, the re-reading time 3 months later, and the consistency of imaging interpretation were determined and compared between groups. After using KIN technique, the time used in making a report was significantly increased (8.77 +/- 5.27 vs. 10.53 +/- 5.71 min, P < 0.05), the re-reading time was decreased (5.23 +/- 2.54 vs. 4.99 +/- 1.70 min, P < 0.05), the clinical interpretation and reinterpretation time after 3 months were decreased, and the consistency of the interpretation, reinterpretation between different doctors in different time was markedly improved (P < 0.01). CT report with KIN technique in PACS can significantly improve the consistency of the interpretation and efficiency in routine clinical work.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available