4.8 Article

Intercalation processes of copper complexes in DNA

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 43, Issue 11, Pages 5364-5376

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkv467

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [R01 GM081411]
  2. Blue Waters Sustained-Petascale Computing Project [NSF OCI 07-25070, PRAC OCI-1440031]
  3. NSF Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment [OCI-1053575, MCA01S027P]
  4. Center for High Performance Computing at the University of Utah, Miztli supercomputer at DGTIC-UNAM [2014-1-56]
  5. PAPIIT-UNAM [IN208113]
  6. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  7. Office of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure (OAC) [1440031] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The family of anticancer complexes that include the transition metal copper known as Casiopeinas (R) shows promising results. Two of these complexes are currently in clinical trials. The interaction of these compounds with DNA has been observed experimentally and several hypotheses regarding the mechanism of action have been developed, and these include the generation of reactive oxygen species, phosphate hydrolysis and/or base-pair intercalation. To advance in the understanding on how these ligands interact with DNA, we present a molecular dynamics study of 21 Casiopeinas with a DNA dodecamer using 10 mu s of simulation time for each compound. All the complexes were manually inserted into theminor groove as the starting point of the simulations. The binding energy of each complex and the observed representative type of interaction between the ligand and the DNA is reported. With this extended sampling time, we found that four of the compounds spontaneously flipped open a base pair and moved inside the resulting cavity and four compounds formed stacking interactions with the terminal base pairs. The complexes that formed the intercalation pocket led to more stable interactions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available