4.8 Article

TRF1 and TRF2 binding to telomeres is modulated by nucleosomal organization

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 43, Issue 12, Pages 5824-5837

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkv507

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Istituto Pasteur-Fondazione Cenci-Bolognetti
  2. Progetti di Ateneo (Sapienza University)
  3. Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer (EG Equipe labelisee)
  4. Institut Nationale du Cancer (INCa) (program TELOCHROM)
  5. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (program TELOLOOP)
  6. Investments for the Future LABEX SIGNALIFE [ANR-11-LABX-0028-01]
  7. Istituto Pasteur-Fondazione Cenci-Bolognetti, Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The ends of eukaryotic chromosomes need to be protected from the activation of a DNA damage response that leads the cell to replicative senescence or apoptosis. In mammals, protection is accomplished by a six-factor complex named shelterin, which organizes the terminal TTAGGG repeats in a still ill-defined structure, the telomere. The stable interaction of shelterin with telomeres mainly depends on the binding of two of its components, TRF1 and TRF2, to double-stranded telomeric repeats. Tethering of TRF proteins to telomeres occurs in a chromatin environment characterized by a very compact nucleosomal organization. In this work we show that binding of TRF1 and TRF2 to telomeric sequences is modulated by the histone octamer. By means of in vitro models, we found that TRF2 binding is strongly hampered by the presence of telomeric nucleosomes, whereas TRF1 binds efficiently to telomeric DNA in a nucleosomal context and is able to remodel telomeric nucleosomal arrays. Our results indicate that the different behavior of TRF proteins partly depends on the interaction with histone tails of their divergent N-terminal domains. We propose that the interplay between the histone octamer and TRF proteins plays a role in the steps leading to telomere deprotection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available