4.8 Article

Microfluidic droplet enrichment for targeted sequencing

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 43, Issue 13, Pages -

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkv297

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF Career Award [DBI-1253293]
  2. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [HG007233-01]
  3. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA/MTO) Living Foundries Program [HR0011-12-C-0065]
  4. NIH Grant [R41HG008117-01]
  5. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  6. University of California, San Francisco
  7. Direct For Biological Sciences
  8. Div Of Biological Infrastructure [1253293] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Targeted sequence enrichment enables better identification of genetic variation by providing increased sequencing coverage for genomic regions of interest. Here, we report the development of a new target enrichment technology that is highly differentiated from other approaches currently in use. Our method, MESA (Microfluidic droplet Enrichment for Sequence Analysis), isolates genomic DNA fragments in microfluidic droplets and performs TaqMan PCR reactions to identify droplets containing a desired target sequence. The TaqMan positive droplets are subsequently recovered via dielectrophoretic sorting, and the TaqMan amplicons are removed enzymatically prior to sequencing. We demonstrated the utility of this approach by generating an average 31.6-fold sequence enrichment across 250 kb of targeted genomic DNA from five unique genomic loci. Significantly, this enrichment enabled a more comprehensive identification of genetic polymorphisms within the targeted loci. MESA requires low amounts of input DNA, minimal prior locus sequence information and enriches the target region without PCR bias or artifacts. These features make it well suited for the study of genetic variation in a number of research and diagnostic applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available