4.3 Article

Can hemoglobin A1c in early pregnancy predict adverse pregnancy outcomes in diabetic patients?

Journal

JOURNAL OF DIABETES AND ITS COMPLICATIONS
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages 203-207

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2013.10.004

Keywords

Hemoglobin A1c; Pre-existing diabetes mellitus; Adverse pregnancy outcome; Shoulder dystocia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To examine the association of elevated early pregnancy hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels with adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with preexisting diabetes mellitus. Study Design: Retrospective cohort study of 330 women with preexisting diabetes enrolled in a Diabetes in Pregnancy Program at an academic institution between 2003 and 2011 who had an early HbA1c determination. The frequencies of composite maternal adverse pregnancy outcomes (birth at < 37 weeks, preeclampsia, and medically indicated birth <39 weeks), and composite fetal adverse pregnancy outcomes [shoulder dystocia, Apgar scores <7 at 5 minutes, small for gestational age (SGA), large for gestational age (LGA), and stillbirth] were compared between HbA1c categories (<6.5, 6.5-7.4, 7.5-8.4 and >= 8.5%). Results: There was no statistically significant difference between composite adverse maternal pregnancy outcomes and composite adverse fetal pregnancy outcomes as well as other individual outcomes between different HbA1c categories. Of the vaginally delivered women in our cohort, the 37 patients with HbA1c levels of >= 8.5% had a significantly higher frequency of fetal shoulder dystocia than the 62 with HbA1c levels of <8.5% (24.2 vs. 1.6%, P = 0.002). Neonates of patients with HbA1c >= 8.5% were more likely to have low five minute Apgar scores than neonates of patients with HbA1c <8.5%, but this was of borderline statistical significance (7.4% vs. 0.5%, P = 0.05). Conclusion: In patients with preexisting diabetes mellitus, HbA1c levels of >= 8.5% during early pregnancy are not useful in predicting most adverse outcomes, although there may be an increased risk for shoulder dystocia. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available