4.8 Article

A transcription-independent epigenetic mechanism is associated with antigenic switching in Trypanosoma brucei

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 44, Issue 7, Pages 3131-3146

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkv1459

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia [PTDC/SAU-MIC/113225/2009]
  2. European Molecular Biology Organization Installation grant [2151]
  3. Howard Hughes Medical Institute International Early Career Scientist Program [55007419]
  4. [SFRH/BD/80718/2011]
  5. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/80718/2011, PTDC/SAU-MIC/113225/2009] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Antigenic variation in Trypanosoma brucei relies on periodic switching of variant surface glycoproteins (VSGs), which are transcribed monoallelically by RNA polymerase I from one of about 15 bloodstream expression sites (BES). Chromatin of the actively transcribed BES is depleted of nucleosomes, but it is unclear if this open conformation is a mere consequence of a high rate of transcription, or whether it is maintained by a transcription-independent mechanism. Using an inducible BES-silencing reporter strain, we observed that chromatin of the active BES remains open for at least 24 hours after blocking transcription. This conformation is independent of the cell-cycle stage, but dependent upon TDP1, a high mobility group box protein. For two days after BES silencing, we detected a transient and reversible derepression of several silent BESs within the population, suggesting that cells probe other BESs before commitment to one, which is complete by 48 hours. FACS sorting and subsequent subcloning confirmed that probing cells are switching intermediates capable of returning to the original BES, switch to the probed BES or to a different BES. We propose that regulation of BES chromatin structure is an epigenetic mechanism important for successful antigenic switching.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available