4.8 Article

Quantitative characterization of protein-protein complexes involved in base excision DNA repair

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 43, Issue 12, Pages 6009-6022

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkv569

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Russian Scientific Foundation [14-24-00038]
  2. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [13-04-00555]
  3. Program of RAS Presidium 'Molecular and Cellular Biology'
  4. Russian Science Foundation [14-24-00038] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Base Excision Repair (BER) efficiently corrects the most common types of DNA damage in mammalian cells. Step-by-step coordination of BER is facilitated by multiple interactions between enzymes and accessory proteins involved. Here we characterize quantitatively a number of complexes formed by DNA polymerase beta (Pol beta), apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 (APE1), poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1), X-ray repair cross-complementing protein 1 (XRCC1) and tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase 1 (TDP1), using fluorescence-and light scatteringbased techniques. Direct physical interactions between the APE1-Pol beta, APE1-TDP1, APE1-PARP1 and Pol beta-TDP1 pairs have been detected and characterized for the first time. The combined results provide strong evidence that the most stable complex is formed between XRCC1 and Pol beta. Model DNA intermediates of BER are shown to induce significant rearrangement of the Pol beta complexes with XRCC1 and PARP1, while having no detectable influence on the protein-protein binding affinities. The strength of APE1 interaction with Pol beta, XRCC1 and PARP1 is revealed to be modulated by BER intermediates to different extents, depending on the type of DNA damage. The affinity of APE1 for Pol beta is higher in the complex with abasic site-containing DNA than after the APE1-catalyzed incision. Our findings advance understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying coordination and regulation of the BER process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available