4.8 Article

Concerted and differential actions of two enzymatic domains underlie Rad5 contributions to DNA damage tolerance

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 43, Issue 5, Pages 2666-2677

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkv004

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. US National Institutes of Health [GM080670]
  2. American Cancer Society [RSG-12-013-01-CCG]
  3. Leukemia and Lymphoma Society Scholar Award
  4. European Research Council [REPSUBREP 242928]
  5. Italian Association for Cancer research [AIRC IG14171]
  6. Fondazione Telethon [GGP12160]
  7. Cancer Research UK

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Many genome maintenance factors have multiple enzymatic activities. In most cases, how their distinct activities functionally relate with each other is unclear. Here we examined the conserved budding yeast Rad5 protein that has both ubiquitin ligase and DNA helicase activities. The Rad5 ubiquitin ligase activity mediates PCNA poly-ubiquitination and subsequently recombination-based DNA lesion tolerance. Interestingly, the ligase domain is embedded in a larger helicase domain comprising seven consensus motifs. How features of the helicase domain influence ligase function is controversial. To clarify this issue, we use genetic, 2D gel and biochemical analyses and show that a Rad5 helicase motif important for ATP binding is also required for PCNA poly-ubiquitination and recombination-based lesion tolerance. We determine that this requirement is due to a previously unrecognized contribution of the motif to the PCNA and ubiquitination enzyme interaction, and not due to its canonical role in supporting helicase activity. We further show that Rad5's helicase-mediated contribution to replication stress survival is separable from recombination. These findings delineate how two Rad5 enzymatic domains concertedly influence PCNA modification, and unveil their discrete contributions to stress tolerance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available