Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Guidance on posterior resin composites: Academy of Operative Dentistry - European Section
Christopher D. Lynch et al.
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY (2014)
Patient Risk Factors' Influence on Survival of Posterior Composites
F. H. van de Sande et al.
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH (2013)
Longevity of posterior resin composite restorations in permanent teeth in Public Dental Health Service: A prospective 8 years follow up
Ulla Pallesen et al.
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY (2013)
Longevity of posterior composite restorations: Not only a matter of materials
Flavio F. Demarco et al.
DENTAL MATERIALS (2012)
Clinical performance of a hybrid resin composite with and without an intermediate layer of flowable resin composite: A 7-year evaluation
Jan W. V. van Dijken et al.
DENTAL MATERIALS (2011)
Nanohybrid vs. fine hybrid composite in extended Class II cavities after six years
Norbert Kraemer et al.
DENTAL MATERIALS (2011)
22-Year clinical evaluation of the performance of two posterior composites with different filler characteristics
Paulo A. Da Rosa Rodolpho et al.
DENTAL MATERIALS (2011)
Four-year clinical evaluation of Class II nano-hybrid resin composite restorations bonded with a one-step self-etch and a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive
Jan W. V. van Dijken et al.
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY (2011)
12-year Survival of Composite vs. Amalgam Restorations
N. J. M. Opdam et al.
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH (2010)
Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: A 12-year follow-up
Jan W. V. van Dijken
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY (2010)
A prospective randomized clinical trial of one bis-GMA-based and two ormocer-based composite restorative systems in class II cavities: Five-year results
P. Bottenberg et al.
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY (2009)
Clinical evaluation of two packable posterior composites A five-year follow-up
Ticiane Cestari Fagundes et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION (2009)
Six-year Clinical Evaluation of Packable Composite Restorations
A. Kiremitci et al.
OPERATIVE DENTISTRY (2009)
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
David Moher et al.
PLOS MEDICINE (2009)
Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial
Mario Bernardo et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION (2007)
Nine-year evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite open sandwich technique in Class II cavities
Anders Lindberg et al.
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY (2007)
Fiber-reinforced packable resin composites in Class II cavities
Jan W. V. van Dijken et al.
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY (2006)
Fatigue resistance of dentin/composite interfaces with an additional intermediate elastic layer
J De Munck et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES (2005)
Long-term evaluation of extensive restorations in permanent teeth
JP Van Nieuwenhuysen et al.
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY (2003)
Direct composite inlays versus conventional composite restorations: 5-year follow-up
RW Wassell et al.
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY (2000)
Direct resin composite inlays/onlays: an 11 year follow-up
JWV van Dijken
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY (2000)
A five-year clinical evaluation of Class II composite resin restorations
B Köhler et al.
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY (2000)
Share Paper
