4.7 Article

Formation of Engineered Bone with Adipose Stromal Cells from Buccal Fat Pad

Journal

JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH
Volume 91, Issue 6, Pages 592-597

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0022034512445633

Keywords

buccal fat pad; adipose tissue; mesenchymal stem cells; cultured condition; BMP-2; bone regeneration

Funding

  1. Nagasaki University
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [22390387]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22390375, 22390387] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A robust method for inducing bone formation from adipose-derived stromal cells (ADSCs) has not been established. Moreover, the efficacy of strong osteogenic inducers including BMP-2 for ADSC-mediated bone engineering remains controversial. Meanwhile, the buccal fat pad (BFP), which is found in the oral cavity as an adipose-encapsulated mass, has been shown to have potential as a new accessible source of ADSCs for oral surgeons. However, to date, there have been no reports that define the practical usefulness of ADSCs from BFP (B-ADSCs) for bone engineering. Here, we report an efficient method of generating bone from B-ADSCs using rhBMP-2. The analyses show that B-ADSCs can differentiate in vitro toward the osteoblastic lineage by the addition of rhBMP-2 to culture medium, regardless of the presence of osteoinductive reagents (OSR), as demonstrated by measurements of ALP activity, in vitro calcification, and osteogenic gene expression. Interestingly, adipogenic genes were clearly detectable only in cultures with rhBMP-2 and OSR. However, in vivo bone formation was most substantial when B-ADSCs cultured in this condition were transplanted. Thus, B-ADSCs reliably formed engineered bone when pre-treated with rhBMP-2 for inducing mature osteoblastic differentiation. This study supports the potential translation for B-ADSC use in the clinical treatment of bone defects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available