4.7 Article

Technical note: Evaluation of a system for monitoring rumination in heifers and calves

Journal

JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE
Volume 94, Issue 1, Pages 426-430

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2010-3239

Keywords

heifer calf; rumen development; rumination behavior; validation

Funding

  1. Tiergyn Berlin e.V. (Berlin
  2. Germany)
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  4. Dairy Farmers of Canada
  5. Freie Universitat Berlin

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Hi-Tag electronic rumination-monitoring system (SCR Engineers Ltd., Netanya, Israel), based on capturing audio recordings, provides a reasonable measure of rumination time in dairy cows, but has not been validated for milk-fed or weaned heifers. The objective of this study was to validate the Hi-Tag rumination-monitoring system in heifers and calves and to assess whether suckling from a teat interfered with recording from this system. Assessments of 2 independent observers were highly correlated (r = 0.99, n = 20), indicating that direct visual observations provide a useful standard. Measures from the Hi-Tag system were validated by comparing values with those from a single human observer, using observations from three 2-h intervals from 35 Holstein calves and heifers aged 4, 6, and 9 wk and 3, 6, and 9 mo, respectively. In 9-mo-old heifers, rumination times obtained from the electronic system were highly correlated with visual observations (r = 0.88, R-2 = 0.77, n = 15), and the mean difference was minor (-4 +/- 8 min/2-h interval). The accuracy of data from the automated system decreased when used on heifers less than 9 mo old. Suckling did not interfere with the electronic system (r = -0.1, n = 18). These results indicate that the Hi-Tag system is an accurate tool for monitoring rumination behavior in Holstein Friesian heifers from the age of 9 mo.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available