4.3 Article

Sweat chloride as a biomarker of CFTR activity: Proof of concept and ivacaftor clinical trial data

Journal

JOURNAL OF CYSTIC FIBROSIS
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages 139-147

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcf.2013.09.007

Keywords

Cystic fibrosis; Nasal potential difference; Variance; Sweat test

Funding

  1. Vertex Pharmaceuticals
  2. Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated
  3. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Therapeutics, Inc.
  4. FDA Office of Orphan Products Development [FD-R-003432-01]
  5. NCRR/NIEI [CTSA UL 1RR014780]
  6. CFF [HOCH13B0]
  7. NHLBI/NIH
  8. NIDDK/NIH [P30-DK089507]
  9. ITHS NIH/NCATS [2UL1TR000423]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: We examined data from a Phase 2 trial {NCT00457821} of ivacaftor, a CFTR potentiator, in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients with a G551D mutation to evaluate standardized approaches to sweat chloride measurement and to explore the use of sweat chloride and nasal potential difference (NPD) to estimate CFTR activity. Methods: Sweat chloride and NPD were secondary endpoints in this placebo-controlled, Multicenter trial. Standardization of sweat collection, processing, and analysis was employed for the first time. Sweat chloride and chloride ion transport (NPD) were integrated into a model of CFTR activity. Results: Within-patient sweat chloride determinations showed sufficient precision to detect differences between dose-groups and assess ivacaftor treatment effects. Analysis of changes in sweat chloride and NPD demonstrated that patients treated with ivacaftor achieved CFTR activity equivalent to approximately 35%-40% of normal. Conclusions: Sweat chloride is useful in multicenter trials as a biomarker of CFTR activity and to test the effect of CFTR potentiators. (C) 2013 European Cystic Fibrosis Society. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available