4.3 Article

Safety, efficacy and convenience of tobramycin inhalation powder in cystic fibrosis patients: The EAGER trial

Journal

JOURNAL OF CYSTIC FIBROSIS
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages 54-61

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcf.2010.10.003

Keywords

Cystic fibrosis; Tobramycin inhalation powder (TIP (TM)); Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Lung infection

Funding

  1. Aradigm Corp
  2. Boehringer Ingelheim
  3. CSL Behring
  4. Genentech, Inc.
  5. GlaxoSmithKline
  6. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
  7. NanoBio
  8. Nektar Therapeutics
  9. Novartis Pharmaceuticals
  10. AstraZeneca
  11. Novartis
  12. Discovery Labs
  13. Genentech
  14. MAP Pharmaceuticals
  15. Teva
  16. Novartis Pharma AG (Basel, Switzerland)
  17. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [P30DK027651] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: A light-porous-particle, dry-powder formulation of tobramycin was developed, using PulmoSphere (R) technology, to improve airway delivery efficiency, substantially reduce delivery time, and improve patient convenience and satisfaction. We evaluated the safety, efficacy and convenience of tobramycin inhalation powder (TIP (TM)) versus tobramycin inhalation solution (TIS, TOBI (R)) for treating Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients aged >= 6 years. Methods: In this open-label study, 553 patients were randomized 3:2 to TIP (total 112 mg tobramycin) via the Novartis T-326 Inhaler or TIS 300 mg/5 mL via PARI LC (R) PLUS nebulizer twice daily for three treatment cycles (28 days on-drug, 28 days off-drug). Safety, efficacy, and treatment satisfaction outcomes were evaluated. Results: TIP was generally well-tolerated; adverse events were similar in both groups. The rate of cough suspected to be study drug related was higher in TIP-treated patients (TIP: 25.3%; TIS: 4.3%), as was the overall discontinuation rate (TIP: 26.9%; TIS: 18.2%). Increases in FEV1% predicted from baseline to Day 28 of Cycle 3 were similar between groups; the mean reduction in sputum P. aeruginosa density (log(10) CFU/g) on Day 28 of Cycle 3 was also comparable between groups. Administration time was significantly less for TIP (mean: 5.6 versus 19.7 min, p<0.0001). Treatment satisfaction was significantly higher for TIP for effectiveness, convenience, and global satisfaction. Conclusions: TIP has a safety and efficacy profile comparable with TIS, and offers a far more convenient treatment option for pseudomonas lung infection in CF. (C) 2010 European Cystic Fibrosis Society. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available