4.3 Article

Fenretinide prevents the development of osteoporosis in Cftr-KO mice

Journal

JOURNAL OF CYSTIC FIBROSIS
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages 222-230

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcf.2007.09.001

Keywords

osteoporosis; cystic fibrosis; arachidonic acid; docosahexaenoic acid; ceramide; Cftr-KO mice

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The most recently described phenotype associated with Cystic Fibrosis (CF) is reduced bone mineral density which results in osteopenia and osteoporosis. The etiology of the early onset of osteoporosis in CF patients has remained to be established. It has been suggested that inadequate nutritional absorption of essential fatty acids may play a role in the altered bone metabolism. In this study, we characterized the protective effect of fenretinide [N-(4-hydroxyphenyl) retinamide], a vitamin A derivative, on the early onset of osteoporosis in cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator knockout (Cftr-KO) mice. Methods: Using micro-computed-tomography we examined the effect of fenretinide on the bone composition and architecture in a Cftr-KO mouse model which was then confirmed with histological analyses. Plasma fatty acids were quantified using thin layer chromatography-ELISA method. Results: Twice-weekly treatments with fenretinide, over four weeks dramatically increased trabecular bone volume compared to controls. This increase in bone volume was also related to an increased concentration of ceramide in the plasma resulting in the down regulation of phospholipid-bound AA in Cftr-KO mice. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first time that fenretinide's protective effect against osteoporosis has been demonstrated. The results of this study strongly suggest that fenretinide has potential to be used as a prophylaxis by preventing the early onset of osteoporosis. (C) 2007 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Cystic Fibrosis Society.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available