4.4 Article

Evaluation of growth methods for the heteroepitaxy of non-polar (11(2)over-bar0) GAN on sapphire by MOVPE

Journal

JOURNAL OF CRYSTAL GROWTH
Volume 408, Issue -, Pages 32-41

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2014.09.009

Keywords

Defects; Characterization; Metalorganic vapor phase epitaxy; Nitrides

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (United Kingdom) [EP/J003603/1, EP/H0495331]
  2. European Research Council under the European Community [279361]
  3. EPSRC [EP/I012591/1, EP/J001627/1, EP/J003603/1, EP/H019324/1, EP/H047816/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/J001627/1, EP/I012591/1, EP/J003603/1, EP/H019324/1, EP/H047816/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Non-polar a-plane gallium nitride (GaN) films have been grown on r-plane (1 (1) over bar 02) sapphire by metal organic vapour phase epitaxy (MOVPE). A total of five in situ defect reduction techniques for a-plane GaN are compared, including two variants with a low temperature GaN nucleation layer (LTNL) and three variants without LTNL, in which the high-temperature growth of GaN is performed directly on the sapphire using various crystallite sizes. The material quality is investigated by photoluminescence (PL), X-ray diffraction, cathodoluminescence, atomic force and optical microscopy. It is found that all layers are anisotropically strained with threading dislocation densities over 10(9) cm(-2). The PL spectrum is typically dominated by emission from basal plane stacking faults. Overall, growth techniques without LTNL do not yield any particular improvement and even result in the creation of new defects, i.e. inversion domains, which are seldom observed if a low temperature GaN nucleation layer is used. The best growth method uses a LTNL combined with a single silicon nitride interlayer. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available