4.1 Article

OCCUPANCY RATES OF PRIMARY BURROWING CRAYFISH IN NATURAL AND DISTURBED LARGE RIVER BOTTOMLANDS

Journal

JOURNAL OF CRUSTACEAN BIOLOGY
Volume 32, Issue 4, Pages 557-564

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1163/193724012X637339

Keywords

burrowing crayfish; Cambarus thomai; Fallicambarus fodiens; site occupancy modeling

Funding

  1. West Liberty University's Department of Natural Sciences
  2. WVDNR, Wildlife Resources Section, Wildlife Diversity Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Among crayfish, primary burrowing species are the least understood ecologically. Many primary burrowing crayfish inhabit floodplains where forested landscapes have been fragmented by agricultural, industrial, or residential uses. In this study, site occupancy rates (psi) were modeled for two primary burrowing crayfish, Fallicambarus fodiens (Cottle, 1863) and Cambarus thomai Jezerinac, 1993. from Ohio and Kanawha river floodplains in West Virginia, U.S.A. Fallicambarus fodiens is one of West Virginia's rarest crayfish, while C. thomai is prevalent in most wetlands along both river floodplains. Occupancy rate modeling incorporated four environmental covariates (forest age, soil type, tree frequency, and land use). Based on presence/absence data, forests with tree ages >100 years (AQAIC(c) = 0) and sites with loam soils (Delta QAIC(c) = 1.80) were most likely to harbor F. fodiens populations. For C. thomai, several models were supported owing to model selection uncertainty, but those with the land use covariate had more total model weight (total w(i) = 0.54) than all other covariate models. Cambarus thomai rarely occupied industrial/agricultural sites, but were often present in forested and residential sites. Although the influence of covariates on site occupancy differed between species, both taxa readily utilized mature forested habitats when available. Conservation actions for F. fodiens and C. thomai should focus on preserving forested tracts along large river floodplains

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available