4.5 Article

Predictors of return to work in survivors of critical illness

Journal

JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE
Volume 48, Issue -, Pages 21-25

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.08.005

Keywords

Intensive care; Return to work; Disability; Mechanical ventilation; Long-term outcomes; Psychological outcomes

Funding

  1. Monash Partners Academic Health Science Centre, Melbourne, Australia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To determine predictors of inability to return to work due to health six-months after intensive care admission; and compare functional recovery between patients who had not returned to work and employed patients. Methods: Participants were working adults admitted to ICU who received >24 h of mechanical ventilation. Outcomes included inability to return to work due to health at six-months post-ICU admission, disability, health status, anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress. Results: Of 107 patients, 31 (29%) were unable to return to work due to health at six-months after ICU admission. Predictors of inability to return to work included longer hospital stay (odds ratio [OR], 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.08; P - .004); lower Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) at admission (OR. 0.86; CI, 0.75-0.99; P= .03); and admission due to major trauma (OR, 8.83; CI, 2.57-30.38; P< .001). Compared to employed patients. those who had not returned to work reported higher levels of disability and psychological distress, and poorer health-related quality of life. Conclusion: Major trauma, lower GCS and increased hospital length of stay predicted inability to return to work due to health at six-months post-ICU admission. Compared to employed patients, those who had not returned to work reported poorer functional recovery. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available