4.5 Article

Use of a folded reverse facial-submental artery submental island flap to reconstruct soft palate defects following cancer ablation

Journal

JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY
Volume 42, Issue 6, Pages 910-914

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2014.01.009

Keywords

Submental flap; Facial artery; Submental artery; Soft palate defect; Oral pharyngeal cancer

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81172563]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Although several techniques have been described for the repair of soft palate defects, soft palate reconstruction remains challenging. This study was performed to evaluate swallowing and speech functions in patients undergoing placement of folded reverse facial-submental artery submental island flaps (FRFF) to reconstruct soft palate defects following cancer ablation. Materials and methods: FRFFs were designed for eight patients with soft palate defects resulting from soft palatal squamous cell carcinoma ablation. The clinical stages of tumours were I in two patients, II in four patients, and III in two patients. FRFFs were created to reconstruct soft palate defects. Swallowing and speech functions were evaluated 3 months postoperatively. Results: One minor flap failure occurred, but all flaps survived. No donor-site problem occurred. Five patients managed ingestion of a solid diet, two managed a soft diet, and one remained on a liquid diet. Six patients achieved normal speech, one achieved intelligible speech, and one retained slurred speech. The patients were followed for 8-48 months; seven patients were living with no evidence of disease, and one was living with disease. Conclusions: The FRFF is reliable for soft palate defect reconstruction following cancer ablation and can achieve satisfactory swallowing and speech functions. (c) 2014 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available