4.5 Article

Arthrocentesis and stabilizing splint are the treatment of choice for acute intermittent closed lock in patients with bruxism

Journal

JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY
Volume 39, Issue 4, Pages 256-260

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2010.05.003

Keywords

Arthrocentesis; Stabilizing splint; Acute intermittent closed lock; Bruxism patients

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to evaluate the long-term outcome of arthrocentesis and stabilizing splints for the treatment of acute closed lock in patients with bruxism. This study included 20 female patients who were divided into two equal groups and who underwent temporomandibular joint (TMJ) arthrocentesis. Patients in the first group wore a full coverage stabilizing splint following arthrocentesis. The second group underwent arthrocentesis only. The scores for preoperative maximal mouth opening (MMO), protrusive movement (PM), contra-lateral (CL) movement (CLM) and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for pain and dysfunction were compared with the follow-up scores obtained by the questionnaire and clinical examination. Statistical evaluation of the baseline and follow-up data was made with the t-test. The follow-up period was 12 months. There was a significant (P < 0.001) increase in the MMO, CL and PMs during the longer-term follow-up period for group 1, while there was a significant decrease (P < 0.019) in these parameters for group 2. The pain and dysfunction levels at follow-up were significantly (P < 0.001) lower than the preoperative values. Ninety percent of patients in group 2 showed pain and dysfunction scores that increased significantly (P < 0.001) and ranged from moderate to severe. The overall success rate was 90% for group 1 and 30% for group 2. In conclusion, arthrocentesis and a stabilizing splint are the treatment of choice for acute closed lock of short duration in young patients with bruxism. (C) 2010 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available